#How to do scarbee rickenbacker bass slides in sonar mac#

Mac users just select the built in вЂњMIDI Guitar Virtual MIDI OutвЂќ.ДҐ. (Setup > MIDI >Input Devices > Check the box next to the MIDI Guitar loop output). In ProTools, enable the same device as input. On Mac its the вЂњMIDI Guitar Virtual MIDI OutвЂќ.Д¤.

#How to do scarbee rickenbacker bass slides in sonar windows#

On Windows that is a loopMidi/loopBe1 device.

#How to do scarbee rickenbacker bass slides in sonar driver#

In MIDI Guitar select the virtual midi loop driver as MIDI Output (bottom left). Make sure MIDI Guitar works in standalone mode, i.e. Mac users can skip this step as Apple operating systems already include a virtual midi standard.Дў. If you are using Windows you need a virtual midi loop driver, such as loopMidi or loopBe1 (both freeware).

#How to do scarbee rickenbacker bass slides in sonar software#

The idea is that you connect MIDI Guitar to ProTools though a virtual cable (in much the same way you would connect a physical midi keyboard controller though its software driver).

#How to do scarbee rickenbacker bass slides in sonar drivers#

Since most ASIO drivers only works with one application at a time you might also need a second interface. Since ProTools does not support VST or AU plugins you need to use MIDI Guitar standalone and a virtual midi driver. Again, just wanted to post an example like this, because so many of the demos were funk oriented tracks and/or solo pieces which, while impressive, can make it hard to judge how realistically the instrument can be used in a rock setting where it's more about fitting into the track and not about standing out.Click to expand.Here's what I found on the website The verses are a bit repetitive (especially the bass part), but the bridge shows off the slide/hammer-on/pull-off articulations a bit. 'Too Much To Ask (Clean Version)' uses the Scarbee Jay Bass Anyhow, here's an example of it in a more straight ahead rock context (it doesn't get more straight ahead than 8ths on the root hahahah): I'm pretty pleased so far, although I'd say in terms of articulations, Pre Bass seems a bit easier to make sound realistic, which is a tiny bit of a bummer, since I generally prefer J-Basses, but the Jay Bass is up to the job, just requires a tiny bit more finesse. The way you are carrying on about samples can also be applied to emulations - they are, well.just emulations.ДЇigured I'd follow up on this post since I did end up getting the Jay Bass and taking advantage of the holiday discount and picking up the Pre Bass as well. Whoa! hold up there bud, I just checked the Blue Reeds Wulitzer and it was ok.yes OK. I can imagine so many sample libraries gathering a thick layer of dust when Mokafix releases his string based instruments.ДЄnd I for one will NEVER EVER EVER buy another sample library trying to be something that it's not. His string based instruments will take the virtual instrument world by storm. All of them are of extremely high quality. He's also done a virtual Pianet (GlueReeds) and of course, various stompbox/distortion FX. Don't believe me? Check out his BlueReeds virtual Wurlitzer E-Piano and let me know if you can tell the difference between BlueReeds and a real Wurlitzer. Mokafix uses comprehensive and very detailed physical modeling. And of course, even the best samples fail because, samples.ДЇorget samples if you want realism, because you are not, you are just not going to get it with samples. It doesn't seem to matter, in fact, the best samples often take so much RAM that it is really becoming stupid to even bother with them. This is a problem inherent to all samples, even the very very very very very good ones. Wait for Mokafix to release his Dark Lady bass guitar, and you will be able to make something that actually sounds like a bass guitar performance instead of a bunch of samples strung together in a vain attempt to sound like a live performance.

At some point will you reveal which company you work for?Д«ut don't pretty much all sample libraries sound very midi and unnatural? I admire your tenacity on the subject, but, unfortunately, I can't say the same for your logic.

I realize I'm oversimplifying, but the science behind the example applies well enough for something as simplistic as audio. So we can clone goats by duplicating their DNA strand-by-strand (sampling), or we can use a computer to develop it from scratch based upon what it thinks a goat should be, driven by initial guidance which has been provided by humans (modeling). Or you're just referring to performance limitations, even with round-robin, multi-velocity layering, articulation programming, etc.? I have hundreds of tracks using sampled instruments which would disagree with this statement, but I'll keep playing along. a 'sample') will no longer sound like that instrument? Something is happening along the way? The 'Seth Brundle' effect. So upon playback, a recording of an instrument (i.e. And of course, even the best samples fail because, samples.(I had trouble deciding which part to respond to as it's all rather thick - I think the above will allow me to cover the gist)